SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 1861

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Ram Bachan Devi – Appellant
Versus
Yogendra Pd. Singh – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.

1. The defendants-appellants have filed this first appeal against the judgment dated 30.1.1988 and the decree following thereupon signed on 17.2.1988 by Sri. G. Mahton, the learned Sub Judge 10th, Patna in Title Suit No. 142 of 1977 decreeing the plaintiff-respondent#25;s suit.

2. The plaintiff-respondent filed the aforesaid tile suit No. 142 of 1977 claiming relief that on declaration of the plaintiff#25;s title and want of title of the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 to the lands described in scheduled-I to the plaint, the possession of the plaintiff be confirmed and in the alternative, the possession may be delivered to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also prayed for mean profit from 25.7.1985 and also prayed for declaration that gift dated 12.1.1968 is forged, fabricated, created document and did not confer any title on the defendant No. 2.

3. The plaintiff claims the aforesaid relief on the facts which may be stated in brief that the defendant Yogeshwar Singh is father-in-law of the plaintiff. Yogeshwar Singh had four daughters. The second daughter Sachita @ Chinta Mani Devi is the wife of plaintiff. The fourth daughter Ram Bachan Devi is the defendant No. 2.


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top