SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 38

SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Rahul Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Heard learned counsel fpr the parties.

2. The petitioner prays for quashing an order dated 29.6.2007, passed by In-charge, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in G.R. No. 274 of 2007, T.R. No. 2156 of 2007, arising out of Rajpur Police Station Case No. 29 of 2007, by which cognizance for offences under Sections 447, 341, 324, 307/34 I.P.C. has been taken against the petitioner, though police after investigation had submitted final form opining that petitioner is innocent.

3. The petitioner submits that even assuming the prosecution case to be true, the petitioner may be said to be a member of mob and only allegation against him is that he too abused others. The petitioner further submits that it would appear from the prosecution case that Surendra Nath Singh instigated, whereupon accused Durgesh fired from his licence gun causing injury to Jai Shankar Choube. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he has assailed the impugned order taking cognizance on the following grounds:

(a) Petitioner is a 14 years old minor boy. In support of his contention, the petitioner has annexed Annexure-2 also.

(b) Many prosecution witnesses including Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Ram






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top