JYOTI SARAN
Baidya Nath Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. Rupak Kumar for the petitioner, Mr. Mahesh Prasad, learned S.C.-8 and Mr. L.P.K. Rajgriahar for the Accountant General.
2. With the consent of the parties this matter has been taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.
3. The petitioner who retired from the post of Junior Engineer with effect from 31.12.2003 has filed the writ petition for payment of his retiral benefits as detailed in paragraph-1 of the writ petition.
4. The facts briefly stated are that a disciplinary proceedings was initiated against one Devendra Prasad Sinha, Assistant Engineer for not furnishing the accounts relating to the advances given to four Junior Engineers including the present petitioner. Evidence of the same is present in Memo No. 1773 dated 14.8.1992 (Annexure-9). Subsequent thereto a separate proceeding was also initiated against the present petitioner vide Memo No. 1645 dated 5.4.2002 (Annexure-14) whereby charges were served upon the petitioner. Whereas charge no. 1 indicted the petitioner of not having submitted timely accounts with regard to an advance of Rs. 4,65,878/- as a result whereof it could not be adjusted in the divisional accounts, charge no. 2 contained all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.