SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 39

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Uday Prakash Chaudhary S/o Hari Prasad Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The grievance of the petitioners is in relation to the voters list as prepared for the purposes of election as members to various PACS that is Primary Agriculture Credit Society in the district of West Champaran. The grievance of the petitioners is that these Societies sent their voters list in the process of being sent finally for printing and publication. It was unauthorisedly interfered by the Block Development Officer who is the Election Officer. From the counter affidavit and the rejoinder thereto, it is evident that even the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, who is the District Election Officer, is of the opinion that the Election Officer-cum- Block Development Officer, Bagaha-2 has wrongly interfered with the electoral rolls and has wrongly instituted first information report in relation thereto as against the printers. The petitioners want that the voters list be prepared in accordance with law after getting over with all these controversies as the voters list, as obtaining today, lacks public confidence and/or authenticity which is apparent from various facts as pleaded both in the counter affidavit and rejoinder.

2. As pleadings are complete, with consent of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top