SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2003

PATNA HIGH COURT
Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.
Shashi Rai Son Of Late Janak Rai
Versus
Union Of India
CWJC No. 14109 of 2010
Decided On : AUGUST 30, 2010

The legal principle established is that the nature of the vehicle and the terms of settlement determine the entitlement to parking rights at the railway station.

Headnote:

Parking Dispute - Railway Station Parking - 16.11.2009 - The court discussed the settlement of the motor car stand with respondent No. 4, allowing him to charge parking fees from owners of all types of four-wheeler vehicles. The court also considered the nature of the Magic vehicle and its suitability for parking in the tempo stand. The court found that the petitioner had no right to park such large four-wheeler vehicles in the tempo stand and dismissed the writ application.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought quashing of an order permitting respondent No. 4 to collect parking fees from Tata Magic Vehicles within the parking area earmarked for the petitioner at the railway station.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had no right to park the large four-wheeler Magic vehicle in the tempo stand and dismissed the writ application.

Issues: Dispute over parking rights for Tata Magic Vehicles at the railway station.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner had no right to park such large four-wheeler vehicles in the tempo stand and that respondent No. 4 was entitled to collect parking fees for all types of four-wheeler vehicles in the parking area settled with him.

Final Decision: The writ application was dismissed for being devoid of any merit.

JUDGEMENT

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add Sri Baskit Rai, the settlee of the motor car stand, Hajipur Railway Station, as party respondent No. 4 in the course of the day.

2. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 5.8.2010 passed by respondent No. 3, the Divisional Rail Manager (Commercial), Sonepur, Chapra by which he has permitted the newly added respondent No. 4 to collect the parking fee from the owners of the Tata Magic Vehicles also within the 670 Sq.m. parking area earmarked for him.

3. The petitioner is a settlee of Tempo Stand at Hajipur Railway Station over an area of 400 Sq.m. and lastly on the expiry of the period of settlement on 9.8.2010 the same has been extended for a further period of ninety days from 10.8.2010 or until the disposal of the next tender. Pursuant to the said settlement he has been collecting the prescribed parking fee from the owners of the tempos. The petitioner claims that the Magic vehicles produced by Tata Motors are also being used as taxi for carriage of passengers and were being parked earlier exclusively in the parking area allotted to him but by the impugned letter dated 5.8.2010 the respondent No. 4 has also been permitted to allow parking of the said vehicles in the parking area of Motor Car Stand, Hajipur Railway Station with him. The respondent No. 4 is settlee of 670 Sq.m. parking space at the Hajipur Railway Station premises for the said motor car stand for the period from 18.11.2009 to 17.11.2012 but by the impugned order dated 5.8.2010 he has been permitted to charge parking fee from the owners of the Magic vehicles also in the parking area allotted to him.

4. According to learned counsel for . the petitioner this has caused uncalled for loss to the petitioner since such vehicles were being parked earlier in his allotted parking area. It is the submission of learned counsel that earlier the said Magic vehicles were also being treated as tempo and required to park exclusively in the tempo stand allotted to him.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the said vehicle is a commercial vehicle being a 4-7 seater vehicle according to the literature from the internet produced by him which specifically states that it is a four-wheeler suitable for rural passengers. It is powered by a 16-horsepower, 700 cc diesel engine. It is thus submitted by learned counsel that it is in the nature of a tempo and it should be permitted for parking exclusively in the tempo stand.

6. Learned counsel submits that if that was not the position, then there was no occasion for the D.R.M. to have issued letter dated 5.8.2010 permitting the respondent No. 4 to get the said vehicles parked in the parking area of the motor car stand settled with him.

7. Learned counsel for the respondent Railways, on the other hand, submits that it is evident from Annexure-2, letter dated 16.11.2009, by which the parking area of motor car stand in the Hajipur Railway Station premises has been allotted to respondent No. 4 that he was permitted to realize parking fees from the owners of all types of four-wheeler vehicles. It is urged by learned counsel that Magic vehicle being a four-wheeler vehicle the normal presumption would be that under the terms of letter dated 16.11.2009 such vehicles were also to be parked in the parking area allotted to respondent No. 4.

8. Learned counsel also submits that the impugned letter dated 5.8.2010 appears to have been necessitated on account of the difficulties created by the petitioner with regard to the parking of the Magic vehicle in the parking area allotted to respondent No. 4 which is evident from the tenor of the said letter.

9. On a consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and for the Railways, this Court does not find any force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. It is evident that the petitioner was allotted settlement of tempo stand for the parking of tempos. The normal connotatio




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top