SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 603

DHARNIDHAR JHA
Shamshuddin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Dharnidhar Jha, J.

1. Seven appellants have appealed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed against them by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Chapra on 15.1.1994 and 17.1.1994 respectively in Sessions Trial Nos. 30 of 1992/114 of 1993. By the impugned judgment the appellants Samsuddin, Jamil Akhtar and Md. Sazad were found guilty of committing offence under Section 307 of the IPC and whereas appellants Samsuddin and Md. Sazad were directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years, Appellant No. 4 Jamil Akhtar was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years. As regards appellant Hasnain, Jabir Hussain, Md. Hasid and Saukat Ali they were found guilty of committing offences under Section 307/149 of the IPC and each of them was directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years. Appellants Samsuddin, Jamil Akhtar, Md. Sazad, Md. Hasid and Saukat Ali were also found guilty of committing offences under Section 148 IPC and each one of them was to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. Appellant Jabir Hussain was found guilty also of committing an offence under Sections 147 and 380 IPC also in addition to being convict























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top