SUDHIR KUMAR KATRIAR, J.

1. This appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature of Patna has been preferred by the petitioner of CWJC No.2449 of 2010, and raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 8.3.2010, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed, and the impugned order dated 22.12.2009, for compulsory retirement of the writ petitioner, has been upheld.

2. A brief statement of facts essential for the disposal of the appeal may be indicated. The appellant was appointed as a Constable on 24.12.80, in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF, for short). He was promoted to the next higher post of Assistant Sub-Inspector on 27.1.84, to the post of Sub-Inspector on 15.7.85, and finally as Inspector on 26.2.2000. He was visited with the order dt. 30.4.2009, of compulsory retirement in terms of rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules. The petitioner challenged the same by preferring the previous writ petition bearing CWJC no. 14004 of 2009, which was disposed of by a learned single Judge of this Court, whereby the competent authority was directed to consider the petitioners representation in accordance with law and observations made in t