SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 526

R.M.DOSHIT, JYOTI SARAN
Om Prakash Singh, Son Of Late Ramjee Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Prasad Singh, Son Of Late rajendra Prasad Singh – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. (Per: Honble the Chief Justice) This Appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent arises from the common judgment and order dated 28th January 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in so far as CWJC No. 17804 of 2009* is allowed.

2. The appellants are 18 of the defending respondent nos. 6 to 32 in the Writ Petition. The subject matter of dispute is the selection and appointment of the appellants as Principals in the constituent colleges of the respondent-Magadh University (hereinafter referred to as "the University"). The facts leading to the present Appeal are as under: On 25th October 2008, an advertisement was published under the name of the Vice Chancellor of the University calling for applications from eligible candidates for appointment on 22 vacant posts of Principal in its constituent colleges. Of the 22 vacancies advertised, 6 were reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates, 1 for Scheduled Tribe candidate and 7 for Extremely Backward Class candidates. Eight vacancies were available for General Category candidates. Against the 22 vacancies advertised, the University, under its Notification dated 8th June 2009, published a select list comprising 23 Gene























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top