SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 244

SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH, SUDHIR KUMAR KATRIAR
Power Grid Corpn. Of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Naresh Singh – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

SUDHIR KUMAR KATRIAR, J.

1. We shall first take up LPA No. 1132 of 2010, preferred under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, wherein grievance has been raised with respect to the judgment dated 17-5-2010, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in CWJC No. 6993 of 2010 (Ram Naresh Singh and another v. Power Grid Corporation), whereby the writ petition has been allowed, and the appellants have been denied permission to install transmission towers on the lands of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein (the writ petitioners) on the ground of failurp on the part of the appellants to follow the prescribed procedure. The writ petition has been disposed of with the direction that"..........Power Grid Corporation is restrained from entering upon private property without full due compliance of sub-rules (1), (2) and (3) of Rule 3 of the Works of Licensee Rules, 2006, which is mandatory in nature." Hence this appeal at the instance of the appellants. We shall go by the description of the parties occurring in the present proceeding.

2. A brief statement of facts essential for the disposal of the appeal may be indicated. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top