SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 79

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Surendra Prasad Son Of Late markandey Saw – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Navaniti Pd.Singh, J.

1. The parties agree that in view of the submissions being made, the records of the departmental proceedings may not be necessary.

2. Heard the parties.

3. The petitioner challenges the order as passed in a duly constituted departmental proceeding wherein, finding petitioner guilty, he has been dismissed from service which order has not been interfered with by the appellate authority that is the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar. The petitioner was an Assistant in the Home (Special) Department dealing with Swatantra Senani Pension. A departmental proceeding was initiated against him basically on four charges. Firstly, that the petitioner, though had received part payment towards his T.A. bill, he illegally put pressure on the Department so as to receive payment all over again. Secondly, the petitioner filed criminal complaint case against employees and officers of the Government without seeking prior permission of the Department. Thirdly, petitioner, in the file notings, made uncalled for and indisciplined remarks about his superior officer which is destructive of discipline. Fourthly, the petitioner, under orders of transfer, did not handover char




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top