SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 173

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Gauri Shankar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Shankaranand Upadhyay – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.

1. Heard all the parties on Interlocutory application No. 6685 of 2010, interlocutory application No. 10326 of 2010, I.A. No. 9920 of 2010, I.A. No. 9921 of 2010 and I.A. No. 10252 of 2010. All these five interlocutory applications were pressed by their respective counsels and are being disposed of by this common order as all of them are interlinked. Heard Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dwivedi, the learned senior counsel on behalf of the Appellant. Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, the learned senior counsel on behalf of the Respondent No. 1. Mr. Raghiv Ahsan, learned senior counsel on behalf of Respondent No. 2. Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma on behalf of the interveners and likewise, Mr. V. Nath, the learned Counsel on behalf of another interveners.

2. For the purpose of disposal of these interlocutory applications, the brief facts are stated as hereunder.

3. The three Appellants, Gourishankar Pathak, Shivshanker Pathak and Prem Shanker Pathak have filed this First Appeal against the compromise final decree signed on 3-4-2010 by Sub-Judge-I, Patna in Title Suit No. 269 of 1996.

4. The said title (Partition) suit No. 269 of 1996 was filed by one of the partner, namely, Dr. Shan








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top