1. This Civil Revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.10.2009, passed by the Additional Munsif-I, Barh in Eviction Suit No. 6 of 1998, whereby the defendants-petitioners have been directed to vacate the suit premises and handover the vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff-opposite party within two months.

2. Bereft of details, short facts necessary for Consideration of the controversy in issue are as under:

3. Plaintiff-opposite party claims to be the owner and the landlord of the suit premises fully described in the Schedule to the plaint. It is the case of the plaintiff that the premises concerned was purchased by his father, namely Ram Prasad Lal Gupta in the name of his brother-in- law Pasupati Nath Sah and had inducted the defendants as tenant under the stipulated terms of contract of the tenancy for the purposes of carrying out the business of his firm in the name and style as M/s Arun Kumar, Ashok Kumar and as the holding was purchased in the name of Pashupati Nath Sah and the deed of lease was executed on 3.3.1969 in his signature on the monthly rent of Rs. 81/- and accordingly rent was being realised and rent receipts were also issued.