MRIDULA MISHRA, DHARNIDHAR JHA
Bishundeo Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Rama Shankar Pandey – Respondent
Mridula Mishra and Dharnidhar Jha JJ.
1. These matters have been referred by Honble Single Judge, for deciding the issue, that if the previous anticipatory bail order was for a limited period till submission of the charge-sheet and the accused after grant of anticipatory bail has surrendered before the Court for furnishing bail bond, whether in such cases on submission of charge-sheet, second anticipatory bail application is maintainable or the applicant will have to surrender and obtain an order of bail under Sections 437 or 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Single Judge has referred these matters in view of divergent opinion among the Judges about the maintainability of the second anticipatory bail application in such circumstance.
2. Petitioners in these applications were granted anticipatory bail till submission of the charge-sheet. Subsequently when the charge-sheet was submitted, again they filed application for grant of anticipatory bail, which gave rise to question whether in terms of previous order, they are required to appear and surrender before the Court below for seeking regular bail or their prayer for grant of anticipatory baii on the second occasio
Babajee And Ors. V/s. State Of Bihar
Bharat Chaudhary And Another V/s. State Of Bihar
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia V/s. State Of Punjab
K.L. Verma V/s. Siate And Another
Mahendra Prasad Singh V/s. State Of Bihar
Niranjan Singh And Another V/s. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote
Nirmal Jeet Kaur V/s. State Of M.P. And Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.