SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 1116

ANJANA PRAKASH
Sanjiv Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Anjana Prakash, J.

1. The Appellants No. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 have been convicted under Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months and in addition the Appellant No. 5 has also been convicted under Section 225 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 225 of the Indian Penal Code but no separate sentence has been passed under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code. However, after conviction of the 2 Appellants No. 3 and 7 under Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code, they were released on probation under Section 360 Cr. P.C.

2. The case of the prosecution according to the Informant (PW-6) is that while he was posted as J.S.I. at Bihra Police Station on 9.10.1989 and was looking after the law and order situation on occasion of Durga Puja festival, the Appellants arrived there and tried to disturb the peaceful gathering and when they were rounded up, Appellant No. 3 managed to flee away whereas Appellant No. 7 was caught right there.

3. During trial, the prosecution has examined 11 witnesses out of whom PW-6 is the Informant whereas PW-8 is said to have one of the victims and PW


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top