SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 1208

PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA, ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Verma S/o Shri Vishundeo Prasad – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the Judgment passed on 6.10.2009 by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 3867 of 2009, by which the learned Single Judge has set aside the termination order relying on the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka V/s. Uma Devi and Ors. reported in 2006(2) P.L.J.R. (SC)363, and considered by the Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka & Ors V/s. M.L. Kesari & Ors. reported in (2010)9 SCC 247 in paragraph 11 of the Judgment. The Apex Court has observed as follows:

"The object behind the said direction in para 53* of Umadevi is two fold, First is to ensure that those who have put in more than ten years of continuous service without the protection of any interim orders of Court or Tribunals, before the date of decision in Umadevi was rendered, are considered for regularization in view of their long service. Second is to ensure that the departments/instrumentalities do not perpetuate the practice of employing persons on daily wage/ ad hoc/ casual basis for long periods and then periodically regularize them on the ground that they have served for more than ten years, thereby defeating the constitutional or statutory prov



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top