SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 1191

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mridula Mishra, J.
Bal Krishan Sahay
Versus
State Of Bihar
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION No. 1768 of 2005
CWJC No. 10101 of 2009
CWJC No. 8403 of 2010
CWJC No. 14313 of 2008
CWJC No. 2701 of 2009
Decided On : JUNE 27, 2011

Headnote:Service Law-Seniority-petitioners claiming seniority retrospectively-Petitioners were applicants for the post of Asstt. Engineers-advertised through Advertisement No. 93 of 1985-by a subsequent Cabinet decision dated 2.2.1988, vacancies till 31.12.1987 were decided to be filled up from the panel of Advt. No. 93/85-72 vacancies in the reserved category remained vacant for three consecutive advertisements and ultimately were de-reserved and petitioners were appointed on those posts-national seniority is being claimed by the petitioners on the ground that they belonged to the panel prepared by the BPSC vide Advt. No. 93/1985, and pursuant to cabinet decision dated 2.2.1988, their appointment should be considered be in the same transaction-no one can claim notional promotion as a matter of right or as a matter of course, as it is not a civil or statutory right-it is only awarded by the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution on the basis of equity, in cases of injustice and hardship caused by the circumstances beyond the control of the petitioners-in the present case, there is no case of injustice or hardship in the petitioners appointment, rather they have been benefited on account of their appointment on reserved posts, even though originally they did not compete for appointment in the general category-the so called delay in their appointment was not on account of any legal impediment or act of the State, rather had the rules regarding filling up the unfilled reserved parts been properly implemented, they might not have been appointed at all-facts of the case indicate that petitioners appointment cannot be said to be appointments in same transaction-petitioners cannot be given double benefit, one of appointment and another of notional promotion. (Para 8)

       Service Law-Right to waive the advantage arising from appointment petitioners giving an under-taking at the time of their appointment that they will not claim seniority on the basis of their position in the merit list published by the BPSC and will not claim any financial benefit with retrospective effect-since they themselves showed their eagerness to abide by those conditions, they cannot make any complaint the State in the capacity of employer is empowered to put some condition in the interest of administration as well as for the benefits of its employees. (Para 17)

JUDGEMENT

Mridula Mishra, J.

1. Petitioners in all these writ applications were appointed in the year 1997, 1998 and lastly in the year 2007 as Assistant Engineers in the Joint Cadre of Road/Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar. They were applicants for appointment against Advertisement No. 93 of 1985. Petitioners are claiming their notional seniority, and placement in the gradation list of Assistants Engineers of Road/Building Construction Department, just below the last person appointed on 13.2.1989, against the vacancy in the General Category, in pursuant to Cabinet decision dated 2.2.1988. Petitioners, thus claim to be senior to respondents, who were appointed in reserved category pursuant to advertisement No. 93 of 1985, as well as against subsequent vacancies, pursuant to advertisements published subsequently.

2. Advertisement No. 93 of 1985 was published by the Bihar Public Service commission on 13.10. 1985 for appointment of 245 regular Assistant Engineers in the joint Cadre of Road/Building Construction Department. The selection process started, continued, viva voce held and subsequently the State Government sent requisition to the Bihar Public Service Commission vide letter dated 20.5.1986 and 10.6.1986 that total 738 vacancies available in works departments till 20.8.1986 will be filled from the panel of Advertisement No. 93 of 1985. The Bihar Public Service Commission on 6.4.1987 sent names of 593 general candidates, 273 reserved candidates and 5 more posts falling vacant on account of non-joining. Thus total posts were filled and 593 candidates from general category, 273 from reserved category and 5 more candidates were finally appointed and thus, the transaction initiated vide Advertisement No. 93 of 1985 was almost closed. After the first transaction of appointment was coming to closure, on 2.2.1988, the Cabinet took a decision to fill up all vacancies till 31.12.1987, from the panel of Advertisement No. 93 of 1985. On the basis of this cabinet decision 702 general candidates, 11 economically backward candidates were recommended and last person appointed under general category was Rajesh Kumar Mishra on 13.9.1989. Since all the posts of general category were filled up and reserved posts for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes remained vacant, the Cabinet took decision to fill up these posts by issuing fresh advertisement. Pursuant to this Cabinet decision, the State took a decision dated 28.4.1988 that Road Construction Department, which was the Nodal Department will send special requisition to the Bihar Public Service commission for filling up posts reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes by publication of fresh advertisement. The request was sent to the Bihar Public Service Commission for filling 77 post of Scheduled Castes, 55 for Scheduled Tribes, 181 for Economically Backward Category, 42 for Backward Category, 2 for Economically Backward Women Category and 35 for women. The Bihar Public Service commission vide letter dated 12.12.1988 informed the Secretary, Road Construction Department that advertisement had been issued for 392 reserved posts and interview were held from 1.10.1988 to 13.10.1988. It was also informed that 175 posts reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes remained unfilled as suitable candidates were not available.

3. Advertisement No. 1 of 1994 was published for filling vacancies of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates and advertisement no. 16 of 1994 for filling vacancies in extremely backward category. Despite these advertisement vacancies of all posts in reserved category could not be filled. There remained 72 vacancies in S.T. category which was being carried forward through three consecutive advertisements. So far general category candidates are concerned, all vacancies were already filled and last appointee was Rajesh Kumar Mishra. Since reserved posts, as per Cabinet decisions were decided to be advertised for three years, 387 perso


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top