T.MEENA KUMARI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Nand Lal Mandai son of late Balgovind Mandai – Appellant
Versus
Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur – Respondent
Ahsanudddin Amanullah,. J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondent Tilkamanjhi University, Bhagalpur.
2. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order dated 3.9.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in CW.J.C. No.11755 of 2005 (Nand lal Mandai vs. Tilkamanjhi University & Ors.). The writ petition has been filed in the year 2005 for a direction to the Respondent University to make payment to the petitioner of his entire retiral benefits and other admissible dues. There was a further claim for payment of interest on the same.
3. During the pendency of the writ petition the Court had directed the Respondent University to dispose off the pending representation which has been filed on behalf of the writ petitioner and others. It appears that by order dated 29.6.2008 the said representation stood disposed off by them and the petitioner's earlier promotion given in the year 1981 was held to be unsustainable and in that view of the matter, the salary etc. payable to the petitioner was found to be payable only for the post of Class-IV and not for the promotional Class-III post. Finally, the writ petition came to be di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.