SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 14

AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
Manoj Kumar S/o Sri Chandradev Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration and Public Grievances Department, Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioners: M/s Manan Kumar Mishra, Chakrapani, Amit Pandey, Abhinav Shrivastava, Nagesh Pratap Singh, Ujjwal Kumar (in 13022), Mr. Brajesh Prascd Gupta (in 14070, 15471 & 15457); M/s Mritunjay KUmar, Jubair Ansari (in 14874, 16952, 19063); M/s Sunil Kumar-II, Kumar Madhure-ndra (in 15129).
For the Respondents: M/s Lalit Kishor, Sat BPSC yabir Bharti, Sanjay Pandey.
For the State: M/s Roy Shivaji Nath, Anjani Kumar, Vinay Kirti Singh, Ravindra Kumar Choubey, Anjani Kumar Sharan.

Order

A series of writ applications came to be filed before the High Court by all such candidates whose names did not figure in the result of the PT Examination declared by the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission or BPSC) for what is known as 52nd to 55th batch; Many intervention applications have also been filed with prayers therein that they too be impleaded as petitioners to the writ applications since they have common cause and relief. All have a common grievance against the declaration of the said result in the background that the examination conducted by the Commission has not been fair in the sense that many a questions which were set for the PT Examination had either wrong answers or were wrong questions, at times verging on absurdity or even a right question had a wrong answer provided in the master answer sheet.

2. There is unanimity amongst the petitioners that any declaration of result based on such question bank set by socalled panel of experts cannot form the basis for testing the knowledge of the candidates in a fair and square manner, even if it is for the preliminary examination. For after all qualifying in the preliminary exami








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top