AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
Manoj Kumar S/o Sri Chandradev Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration and Public Grievances Department, Bihar – Respondent
A series of writ applications came to be filed before the High Court by all such candidates whose names did not figure in the result of the PT Examination declared by the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission or BPSC) for what is known as 52nd to 55th batch; Many intervention applications have also been filed with prayers therein that they too be impleaded as petitioners to the writ applications since they have common cause and relief. All have a common grievance against the declaration of the said result in the background that the examination conducted by the Commission has not been fair in the sense that many a questions which were set for the PT Examination had either wrong answers or were wrong questions, at times verging on absurdity or even a right question had a wrong answer provided in the master answer sheet.
2. There is unanimity amongst the petitioners that any declaration of result based on such question bank set by socalled panel of experts cannot form the basis for testing the knowledge of the candidates in a fair and square manner, even if it is for the preliminary examination. For after all qualifying in the preliminary exami
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.