SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 658

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Bijendra Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Birendra Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Rudra Dee Kumar Sinha.
For the Respondent: None.

Judgment

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.-The plaintiff has filed this First Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 16.2.2005 passed by Sri Brahma Nand Prasad, the learned Add!. District Judge, Fast Track Court, Munger in Probate Case No. 5 of 1992 which was subsequently numbered as Title Suit No. 5 of 2001 whereby the learned Court below dismissed the suit with cost.

2. The plaintiff-appellant filed the application for grant of probate or letters of administration which was registered as Probate Case NO.5 of 1992. The defendant-respondent contested the matter and, therefore, in view of Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act, the said application was renumbered as Title Suit No. 5 of 2001.

3. The plaintiff's case in short is that the writing annexed with the application is the last Will and testament of Sukhdeyi Devi wife of late Shyam Sunder Narayan. The Will is dated 2.11 .1988. Sukhdeyi Devi died on 22.11.1988. The said Will was duly executed in favour of the plaintiff by Sukhdeyi Devi at her residence which was duly attested. The plaintiff was serving Sukhdeyi Devi as his mother and out of love and affection, she executed the Will in presence of the witnesses. Sukhdeyi Devi was the wi































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top