SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 373

T.MEENA KUMARI, MIHIR KUMAR JHA
Umesh Chandra Shiva S/o Ramdeo Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Order

These two appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 17.3.2009, whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the respondent Alok Kumar C.W.J.C. No. 16423/2008* has been allowed by setting aside his order of termination. It has to be noted that the prayer in another writ petition of this appellant,• C.W.J.C. No. 1063 of 2009, seeking a direction for his own appointment after setting aside• the appointment of the respondent Alok Kumar, who was the writ petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 16423/2008* has been rejected.

2. Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of appellant Umesh Chandra Shiva while assailing the common order in both the writ petitions has contended that once it becomes an admitted fact that the respondent Alok Kumar was a candidate of general category and could not have been appointed on the post of Shiksha Mitra in view of there being only three vacancies for the post of Shiksha Mitra in the general category, the other conclusions arrived by the learned Single Judge as with regard to upholding the appointment of respondent Alok Kumar cannot be sustained.

3. Per contra Mr. Sudhir Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top