Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.-Cr. Revision No. 302 of 2002 and Cr. Revision No. 354 of 2002 arise out of judgment and order dated 25th January, 2002 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Cr. Appeal No. 10 of 2001 by which the appeal has been dismissed with modification in the sentences to the effect that in case of default of payment of fine on the part of the appellants, instead of rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month each, they shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month, as such both these revision applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Cr. Revision No. 302 of 2002 has been filed by the relatives of the husband of the complainant, whereas, Cr. Revision No. 354 of 2002 has been filed by the husband of the complainant, opposite party no. 2 in both the revision applications.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant-opposite party no. 2 was married to Krishna Kumar Sinha, the petitioner in Cr. Revision No. 354 of 2002 on 12.6.1987 according to 'Vaidik' rituals. During the course of marriage, the mother and the brother of the complainant presented 10 Bhar' gold ornaments, 20 Bhar' sil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document