SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 63

MANDHATA SINGH
Sunil Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajni Kant Pandey, for the appellant.
Ajay Mishra, APP, for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Mandhata Singh. J.-Prosecution Case initiated on fardbayan of one Ranjeet Kumar Singh. Sub-inspector of Police of Mohania P.S., District-Kaimur in short is that on receiving secret information the informant along with other police officials conducted a raid in the house of Baidhyanath Chaudhary, the house of the appellant and his brother Anil Chaudhary where they were residing. Sensing arrival of the police both the accused jumped from the roof of the house and succeeded to flee from there. Their house/room was searched and heroin like substance wrapped in polythene pack and paper pack were found kept on chauki in the room. Same was seized in presence of independent witnesses. On weighing total weight of substance was found 160 grams. After the seizure a seizure list was prepared. Witnesses voluntarily put their signatures on the same. The seized substance was sent to Forensic Laboratory for its examination, it was really any of the substances defined as Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance. Report from the Forensic Laboratory confirmed its being heroin. One of the accused namely Anil Chaudhary did not appear nor could be apprehended, so his case was spilt up and only









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top