2012 Supreme(Pat) 217
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MIHIR KUMAR JHA, J
Sunita W/o Shri Anil Kumar - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Secretary,
Human Resources Development Department - Respondents
CWJC No. 9171 of 2009
Decided on : 07.02.2012
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kripanand Jha, Advocate.
For the Respondent: G.P.-10
The main legal point established is that fraudulent conduct in the appointment process can invalidate the appointment, and the absence of a specific time limit for filing a complaint does not preclude the validity of the complaint.
Headnote:
Fraudulent Appointment - Panchayat Teacher - Bihar Panchayat Teachers Appointment Rules-2006 - Rule 18
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the appointment of respondent no. 9 as a Panchayat Teacher, alleging fraudulent conduct in the selection process.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the appointment process was marred by fraudulent conduct, favoring the petitioner over respondent no. 9, who was found to be a better candidate.
Issues: The issues revolved around the fraudulent conduct in the appointment process, non-production of certificates, and the timeliness of the complaint.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the appointment process was tainted by fraudulent conduct and that the complaint of respondent no. 9 was valid, despite the absence of a specific time limit for filing a complaint.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petitioner's application, affirming the appointment of respondent no. 9 as a Panchayat Teacher.
Mihir Kumar Jha, J
1. Heard counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner in this writ application has assailed the order dated 28.05.2009 passed by the District Teachers Appellate Authority West Champaran hereinafter referred to as the Authority, whereby and whereunder, the complaint filed by the petitioner as against her termination of service and the consequential appointment of respondent no. 9 on the post of Panchayat Teacher has rejected.
3. The facts which are not in dispute and would be sufficient for disposing of this writ application lie in a very narrow compass. The post of Panchayat Shikshak having fallen vacant in South Ghogha Panchayat in the district of West Champaran, a selection procedure was initiated in terms of Bihar Panchayat Teachers Appointment Rules-2006. After submission of application forms, a merit list was prepared on 24.12.2006, wherein, respondent no. 9 was found to be the best candidate among the backward category with 64 per cent marks amongst untrained candidates. It has to be noted that in the same merit list Harendra Ram was found to be the best candidate with 72 per cent marks under the Scheduled Caste category, one Farida Khatoon with 67.91 per cent marks in the most backward female category, Sabir Miandad with 78.13 per cent in the most backward category. The said merit list dated 24.12.2006, obviously was to be now acted upon, inasmuch as, it was mentioned therein, that the counselling would be held on 30.12.2006 at 10 am in Primary School, Mohaddi Sudhar.
4. Surprisingly, this merit list contains signature of only Farida Khatoon and no other person which would be the evidence of the fact that no other candidate was made even aware of the process of counselling to be fixed on 30.12.2006. In fact, there is nothing on record to show that when the merit list was finalized on 24.12.2006, any information was sent to all the other fours candidates. This aspect of the matter get clarified also from the proceedings of 30.12.2006 because on that day the Selection Committee had actually considered the case of the trained teacher, Vijay Kumar Mishir, and thereafter had taken a decision that the information be sent to all the four candidates of all the untrained category as named above. It is therefore, clear that when the alleged information was sent on 30.12.2006 to the four candidates fixing next date of counselling on 08.01.2007, opportunity was sought to be given to all the four candidates ranking highest in respective category to appear and get selected after producing their original marksheets/ certificates on the basis of which they had ranked first in their respective category.
5. It, however, transpires from perusal of the record that the bungling was sought to be committed at this stage, inasmuch as, in the inquiry conducted by the Sub-divisional Education Officer, it has been found :-
<span class="Hfont"> ^^vizf'kf{kr vH;fFkZ;ksa dk izFke dkmalfyax 30-12-06 dks fu/kkZfjr dh x;h Fkh] ftlesa eatw dqekjh lfgr dqy pkj vH;fFkZ;ksa dk uke vafdr gSA dkmalfyax 10-00 cts fnu esa izk0 fo0 eksg|h esa vk;ksftr dh x;h gSA dkmalfyax dh frfFk dks gh vuqifLFkr vH;fFkZ;kaas dks ,d vkSj ekSdk nsrs gq, fnukad 08-01-07 dks dkmalfyax djkus gsrq ;w-ih-lh- fd;k x;k gSA ;w-ih-lh- djus dk le; 12-00 cts fn[kk;k x;k gSA tcfd 'kke 5-00 cts rd vH;fFkZ;ksa dh izrh{kk djuh pkfg, FkhA fnukad 08-01-07 dks eatw dqekjh rFkk vU; vH;fFkZ;ksa dh dkmalfyax dh frfFk fu/kkZfjr FkhA fnukad 08-01-07 dks gh 10-00 cts fnu ea gh dkmalfyax ;w-ih-lh- dj fn;k x;kA tcfd p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa dks dkmalfyax gsrq 5-00 cts 'kke rd izrh{kk djuk pkfg, FkkA
3- fnukad 15-01-07 dks dkmalfyax gsrq le; fu/kkZfjr dh x;h gS ysfdu mlh fnu dqekjh lquhrk ¼fi0 o0 efgyk½ rFkk uq:y glu valkjh ¼v0fi0oxZ½ dks p;fur djrs gq, lqcg 10-00 cts gh ;w-ih-lh- dj fn;k x;k gS] tcfd p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa dks dkmalfyax gsrq 'kke 5-00 cts rd izrh{kk djuh pkfg, FkhA
bl izdkj dqekjh lquhrk dks fi0 fo0 efgyk dksfV esa p;fur dj fu;ksftr fd;k x;k gS ftldk es/k