SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 498

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Amiteshwar Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Shambhu Dayal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
(In FA No. 65 of 1967)
For the Appellants: Mr. Vaidyanath Thakur, Mr. Kailash Nath Diwakar, Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Mr. Shambhu Thakur, Mr. Amish Kumar, Mr. Lala S.Kumar, Mr. A.K.Sinha, Mr. M.P.Bhartee, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Mr. Bhupendra Narain Sinha, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Shivanandan Roy, Sr. Adv., M/s Shambhu Sharan Singh and Praveena Kumari, Adv., Mr. Jagdish Pandey, Mr. Sushil Ch. Sinha, Mr. Ramanugrah Pd. Singh, Mr. Keshav Srivastava, Mr. Uday Kr. Sinha, Mr. Kalyan Kumar Ghosh, Mr. Devendra Pd. Singh, Mr. Kamla Prasad Roy.
(In FA No. 1206 of 1971)
For the Appellants: Mr. Vaidyanath Thakur, Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Mr. Shambhu Thakur, Mr. Amish Kumar, Mr. Lala Sachindra Kumar, Mr. Anshuman Singh, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha-2, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Mr. Ashok Kr.Sinha-2, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shivanandan Roy, Sr. Adv., M/S Shambhu Sharan Singh and Praveena Kumari, Adv., Mr. Kalyan Kr. Ghosh, Mr. Sushil Ch.Sinha, Mr. Ramanugrah Pd. Singh, Mr. Devendra Pd.Singh, Mr. Kripanand Kr.Prabhakar, Mr. Ravindra Kr.Rai.

CAV JUDGMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J. Both the First Appeals are heard together because the result of First Appeal No.1206 of 1971 is dependent on the result of First Appeal No.65 of 1967. The First Appeal No.65 of 1967 was filed by the original plaintiff, Tarkeshwar Dayal against the judgment and decree dated 19.01.1967 passed by Sri Harishanker Prasad Choudhary, Additional Subordinate Judge 2nd Court, Patna in Title Suit No.58 of 1954/20 of 1965 whereby the learned court below dismissed the plaintiff’s suit for declaration that the decree dated 13.02.1950 passed in Title Suit No.8 of 1950 is null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and for partition of half share in the joint family properties. During the pendency of the appeal, the original plaintiff-appellant, Tarkeshwar Dayal died and has been substituted by his legal representatives.

2. The said plaintiff-appellant had filed First Appeal No.1206 of 1971 against the judgment and decree dated 16.07.1971 passed by Sri Dipti Prasad Mukherjee, 2nd Additional Subordinate Judge, Patna in Title Suit No.115 of 1963/43 of 1970 whereby the learned court below dismissed the plaintiff’s suit for pre-emption and in the alternative, for sp



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top