RAVI RANJAN
Jay Shankar Tiwary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
It appears that the order dated 03.07.2012 suffers from error as it has been recorded that only the petitioner, State and respondent nos. 9 and 11 have been heard, however, Sh. Vinay Krishna Tripathy, learned counsel, had also appeared in this case on behalf of respondent nos. 4 to 6 and had also been heard.
2. The aforesaid order stands modified to the extent as above.
3. I have heard the parties on the issue of maintainability of this writ application.
4. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner who is working as ad hoc teacher since seven years and six months in the DAV Public School, Dhanupara, Ara (Bhojpur) with all consequential benefits including the payment of salary and allowance equivalent to the school run by the State Government as well as Central Government (Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangahatan) as per the recommendation of 6th Pay Commission.
5. Petitioner claims that he was initially appointed as a teacher on daily wages on 08.04.02 in the DAV Public School, Dhanupara, Ara. However, subsequently he was continued as a teacher on the ad hoc basis under the consolidated salary o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.