SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 137

V.NATH
Ravi Atal – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Ambuj Nayan Chaubey, Siddharth Harsh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Amresh Kumar Singh.

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Nath)

V. Nath, J.-Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. This civil revision application has been filed by the defendant (tenant)-petitioners under the provision of Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as B.B.C. Act) against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2008 passed in Eviction Suit No. 67/97 by Munsif-III, Patna whereby the suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff opposite party on the ground of personal necessity has been decreed. The parties hereinafter shall be referred to by the rank held by them in the suit.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff, as the owner of the suit premises, has let out the same to the defendant as tenant on a monthly rental of Rs. 600/- besides charges for electricity bill etc. The plaintiff has, at the outset, stated that her affairs are managed by her husband Mungeshwar Prasad Singh and her son Amresh Kumar Singh on her behalf. It is the case of the plaintiff that she has been residing with her fam
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top