V.NATH
Ravi Atal – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Devi – Respondent
(Per: Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Nath)
V. Nath, J.-Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. This civil revision application has been filed by the defendant (tenant)-petitioners under the provision of Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as B.B.C. Act) against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2008 passed in Eviction Suit No. 67/97 by Munsif-III, Patna whereby the suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff opposite party on the ground of personal necessity has been decreed. The parties hereinafter shall be referred to by the rank held by them in the suit.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff, as the owner of the suit premises, has let out the same to the defendant as tenant on a monthly rental of Rs. 600/- besides charges for electricity bill etc. The plaintiff has, at the outset, stated that her affairs are managed by her husband Mungeshwar Prasad Singh and her son Amresh Kumar Singh on her behalf. It is the case of the plaintiff that she has been residing with her fam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.