On 1st November, 1994 petitioner was appointed as Constable. There is no dispute that before the petitioner was appointed as Constable no advertisement was published and, accordingly, he did not offer himself as a candidate to be selected for being appointed. The appointment letter of the petitioner itself shows that the petitioner was treated as a Hero for he defeated an attempt made by armed dacoits, who came for looting, and in course thereof he executed four notorious armed dacoits. This appointment of the petitioner has been revoked by the impugned order dated 3rd February, 2003 on the ground that the appointment of the petitioner was irregular. How and to what extent the appointment of the petitioner was irregular had not been indicated in the order terminating the appointment of the petitioner-Petitioner preferred an appeal. The appellate authority found as a fact that the bravery of the petitioner was reported by the Superintendent of Police, District Magistrate, Inspector General of Police and, ultimately, by the Director General of Police to the Government through the Home Secretary and there-upon the matter was brought to the notice of the then Chief Minister as we