RAVI RANJAN
Anupama Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State of Bihar as well respondent nos. 2 to 4.
2. The writ petitioner seeks quashing of the communication issued vide letter no. 665/Aa dated 26.06.2004, as contained in Annexure 9, sent by the respondent no. 3, whereby the petitioner has been asked to deposit additional amount of Rs. 3,28,613/- along with administrative cost of Rs. 66,745/- for exchange of Flat No. 35FA 4/4 at 2nd Floor in place of earlier allotted Flat No. 35FA 5/23, which is at 4th floor. It has been stated on behalf of the petitioner that Rs. 1,05,000/- has already been paid to the Bihar State Housing Board (hereinafter to be referred to as “the Board”) as per demand by way of last instalment and the total amount paid by the petitioner including the aforesaid amounts to Rs. 3,56,000/- the respondent-Board, upon receipt of aforesaid amount had already issued letter of delivery of possession in favour of the petitioner.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that by a letter dated 27.05.2004, which stands appended as Annexure 7, the petitioner, in view of her health problem and the fact that the elder members are also there in her family, had requ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.