SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 1231

RAKESH KUMAR
Kanti Singh, w/o Late Uma Kant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Krishna Mohan Murari

ORAL ORDER


Heard the parties.

2. The present appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), has been preferred against order dated 13/8/2010, passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna, (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), in Claim Case No. OA00023 of 2000. The learned Tribunal by the said order has rejected the claim petition preferred under Section 125 of the Railway Act 1989 read with Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, on behalf of the appellants claiming compensation of Rs. 4,00000/- on the ground that husband of appellant no. 1 namely, Uma Kant Singh died in an untoward incidence. Appellant no. 1 is the wife of deceased and appellant no. 2 and 3 are son and daughter respectively of the appellant no. 1.

3. It was pleaded that husband of the appellant no. 1 while coming from Lucknow to Kiul on a valid Railway ticket, fell down on the railway track at Kiul Junction due to heavy rush and jerk and received grievous injuries. The deceased was traveling on Howrah-Amritsar Express, Train No. 3050 along with Kishori Singh and Sri Asarfee Singh. After the accident he was initially treated at




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top