SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 2385

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Ekta Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Estate of Late Ram Parichan Singh – Respondent


ORDER

I have heard the learned counsel, Mr. Sandeep Kumar on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel, Mr. Bishwanath Choudhary on behalf of the respondent.

2. The present petitioner, Ekta Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Limited, Patna has filed this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 27.05.2009 passed by Additional District Judge VI, Patna in Title Suit No.9 of 2003 rejecting the application filed by the petitioner under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C. for review of the order dated 12.01.2008 whereby the application filed by the petitioner for being added as party in the aforesaid proceeding was rejected by the Court below. The petitioner also challenged the order dated 12.01.2008.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is purchaser of portion of the property involved in the Will by registered sale deeds and, therefore, he was necessary party. The property belonged to late Ram Parichan Singh who died on 20.05.1999 leaving behind his widow, Mostt. Jipato Devi. Mostt. Jipato Devi on 04.12.2000 sold 60 decimals of her land by registered sale deed and put the petitioner in possession of the property. The r













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top