SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 593

N.PANDEY
Bisheshwar Pd. Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. Kameshwar Pd. Singh and Satish Chandra Jha.
For the State : M/s. S. Arshad Alam and Matloob Rab.

JUDGMENT

N. PANDEY, J.

This writ application has been filed for quashing the order of the Collector, Saharsa dated 22.8.90 in Misc. case no. 12/90-91 under Section 9(2) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act') whereby and where under prayer of the petitioner for release of the land purchased by him from the land holder was rejected.

2. The petitioner had purchased 2 bighas 9 dhurs of land through registered sale deed from respondent no. 10. Thereafter his name was recorded in the revenue records and jamabandi was created. The grievance is that in the ceiling case which was started against respondent no. 10 (vendor), the lands purchased by this petitioner was included and declared surplus. The petitioner, therefore, made an application under Section 9(2) of the Act before the Collector for necessary order to release such land.

3. It appears the petitioner had previously moved this court and filed two writ petitions bearing CWJC no. 5310/83 and thereafter CWJC no. 2692/89. Both the writ petitions were disposed of by order dated 23.1.84 and 14.9.89 respectively, with observation that the petitio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top