SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 437

J.N.DUBEY, I.P.SINGH
Rang Nath Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rama Kant Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. V.N. Sinha, G.P. 9

JUDGMENT

Dr. J.N. Dubey and I.P. Singh, JJ.

A common question of law for determination arises in these writ petitions and therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.

2. All the petitioners belong to Water Resources Department of Government of Bihar. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against them under Rule 55 of the Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1930 (for short ‘Rules’) in connection with certain irregularities allegedly committed by them while they were posted at Kharkai Canal Division Adityapur. The petitioners were served with show cause notices by their respective enquiry Officers. They submitted their show cause and requested for dropping the proceedings. The Petitioners were served with formal chargesheet to which they also submitted their explanations. Not satisfied with the explanation the Enquiry Officers proceeded to enquire into the charges levelled against the petitioners. The disciplinary proceedings continued for about two years and thereafter they were dropped on the ground that there has been undue delay in completion of the same and that the Enquiry Officer had superannuated. Thereafter, petitioners were issued show cau





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top