SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Pat) 2

M.P.SINGH
Ishwar Dayal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioners: M/S Vyas Munni Singh, Beni Madhav Prasad Singh and Anil Jayaswal.
For the State : Mr. Kamta Prasad Gupta.

JUDGMENT

M. P. Singh. J.

This is an application by the accused - Petitioners under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the order passed by the trying magistrate, dated the 26th February, 1979 refusing to transfer the case to a Bench of a Gramkatchery for trial. It appears that the accused moved the Sessions Judge, Arrah for giving a direction that the case be sent to the Gramkachari for trial but the revision petition (Cr. Revision No. 99 of 1979) was dismissed by the Addl. Sessions Judge by order dated the 10th May, 1979. The relevant facts for the purpose of this application are these.

Cognizance was taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under section 452 and 323 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was then transferred to a judicial magistrate for disposal. Charges were framed for offences under sections 448 and 323. No charge was framed under section 452 of the Indian Penal Code, The offences under section. 448 and 323 are triable by the Bench of a Gram Katchery. The two courts below took the view that the jurisdiction of the Gram Katchery was ousted on the very day when the case was found to be under section 452 of the Indian Penal Code at








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top