SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Pat) 95

C.N.TIWARY
Bindeshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rambaran Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioners: Messrs Hari Narain Singh & Raghubansh Singh.
For the opposite party: Sri Shok Haran Singh.

C. N. Tiwary, J.

This revision application is directed against an order, dated 31.12.1974 passed under section 116 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), by which the petitioners have been ordered to execute bond of Rs. 1000/- each with sureties of the like amount each for keeping the peace till the' conclusion of the inquiry in a proceeding under section 107 of the Code, which is pending against them.

2. It appears that petitioner no.2 Chandrashekhar Pd. Singh filed a complaint before the - Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur on 20.7.74 against the opposite party-Rambaran Singh and some other members of his family alleging that on 19.7.74 at 4 P.M. the accused persons started cutting earth in the field of the petitioners, in which maize crops were standing and when the petitioner no. 2 Chandrashekhar Pd. Singh and petitioner no.7 Anil Kumar Singh went to stop them from cutting the earth the members of the opposite party along with other accused persons brutally assaulted them with Farsa, Lathi etc. The Chief Judicial Magistrate sent the complaint petition filed by petitioner no.2 to the Officer incharge Kahus police station for instituti










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top