SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Pat) 142

B.P.JHA
Madan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Gopal Ghutghutia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Shivanandan Roy, Hare Krishna Kumar and Renuka Sharma,
For the Opposite Party : Mr. G. C. Bharuka.

JUDGMENT

B. P. Jha, J.

On 24th August, 1972 the Sarpanch of Dinda Koli initiated a proceeding under subsection (i) of Section 64 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It is relevant at this stage to mention Section 64 of the Act. Section 64 provides that:

"(1) Whenever the Sarpanch has reason to believe that a breach of the peace or disturbance of the public tranquility is imminent and immediate provision or speedy remedy is desirable, he may, by a written letter stating the material facts of the case and served in the prescribed manner direct any person to abstain from a certain act or to take action with respect to a certain property in his possession or his management."

“(3) An order passed under section (i) shall remain in force for days".

Sub-Section (2) of Section 64 of the Act provides that the Sarpanch shall submit the proceeding under sub-section (i) of section 64 of the Act to the Sub-divisional Magistrate. The Sub-divisional Magistrate may, either confirm the order or discharge an order after hearing the parties to the dispute. In this matter the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate, by his order, dated 25th September, 1972 was pleased to



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top