SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Pat) 34

G.N.PRASAD
Mahesh Dhanuk – Appellant
Versus
Sakal Mahto – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the petitioner: Messrs Lalit Mohan Prasad and Hari Ram Sharma.
For the opposite : Party-None.

G.N. PRASAD, J.

This application is directed against the order of the learned Subdivisional Magistrate of Patna City dated the 21st April, 1970. The impugned order came to be passed under the following circumstances.

2. On the 25th September, 1969 the opposite party, Sakal Mahto, filed a petition before the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate for taking action against the petitioner under section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) on the ground that he was in peaceful possession of the disputed lands but the petitioner with ulterior motive had been creating trouble and mischief and so there was a serious apprehension of the breach of the peace and of overt act. This petition of the opposite party was referred to the police for inquiry and report. The police submitted a report to the effect that the claim of the first party was frivolous. After the receipt of the police report the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate recorded an order on the 2nd of February, 1970 for drawing up a proceeding under section 144 of the Code against both the parties. Both the parties filed their respective show cause petitions before the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top