SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Pat) 164

PATNA HIGH COURT
B.P. SINHA & K.B. SINHA, JJ.
People's Union for Civil Liberties - Petitioner
Vs.
State of Bihar & ors - Respondents
Cr.W.J.C. No. 484 of 1982
Decided On : 9.12.1982

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad
For the State: Bipin Bihari Sinha, J.C. to G.P. 6.

Headnote:Constitution of India, Art. 21-Injured accused person, put under chains-No compulsive ground stated or alleged nor their being ground made out that these was no other available practical way of avoiding his escape or that he was so dangerous and desperate that without fetters it was not safe to keep him-They should not be put under chains. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

This application has been filed by the People's Union for Civil Liberties through its Secretary Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Advocate. In paragraph 3 of the petition it has been stated that in the Statesman, an English daily published from Delhi, of October, 14, 1982, a photograph of two tribals who were injured was printed. They were shown lying in the Dumb Sadar Hospital tied through one of their legs to the hospital bed with the help of handcuffs. A prayer has been made that the respondent, namely, the State of Bihar and its officers be directed to remove the fetter of the two injured persons. As earlier directed by this Court, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State explaining the circumstances in which the two injured persons, namely, Shyam Lal Tudu and Rungta Murmu were put under the fetter in the hospital. In paragraph 8 of the Counter affidavit it has been stated that an instruction has been issued by the Superintendent of Police, Dumka to the concerned Constable and the entire police force in the district not to use handcuff to any of the injured accused persons. It is further stated that one of the two accused persons, namely, Rungta Murmu, who was discharged from the hospital, has already been released on bail by the Sessions Judge, Santhal Paragnas at Dumka.

2. In view of this counter affidavit, Mr. Ravi Shanker Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue this application any more. It is, however, expected of the State and its officers that unless there is any compulsive need to fetter a person's limbs, they shall restrain them selves from putting any person under chain. Needless to say that it shall be unreasonable to put a person under fetter unless the State is able to make out that no other practical way of forbidding escape is available, the prisoner being so dangerous and desperate and the circumstances so hostile to safekeeping.

3. The application is accordingly disposed of.

4. Let a copy each be handed over to Mr. Ravi Shanker Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bipin Bihari Sinha, J.C. to G.P. VI, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

Order accordingly.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top