SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Pat) 240

PATNA HIGH COURT
B. P. SINHA & S. S. HASAN, JJ.
Mahabir Pd. Akela : Petr.
Vrs.
State of Bihar & another : Respondents
Cr. W.J.C. No. 147 of 1979
Decided on : 6.11.79

Advocates appeared:
For the petitioner: Sri Braj Kishore Prasad and Sri Krishna Prasad Singh.
For the respondents: Sri R. S. Roy. S. C. III with Jr. Counsel Sri Ashok Kumar Singh.

Headnote:(i) Sec. 3. Bihar Control of Crimes Ordinance-Whether parallel proceedings for externment and for prosecution for substantive offences which form the basis can be proved simultaneously.

       Held, merely because a detenue was liable to be tried in a Criminal Court for the commission of a Criminal offence or to be proceeded against for preventing him from committing offences, would not by itself debar the Government taking action for his detention. So externment proceeding also may continue even though trial is pending. (Para 5)

       (ii) Proceeding u/s 107 Cr. P. C. can not be a ground for holding a person as ‘anti-social element’. It will be open to the person concerned to point out to the District Magistrate that such grounds are not available for externment. (Para 6)

       (ii) Sec. 3 (1) (a) (b), Bihar Control of Crimes Ordinance-A notice u/s 3 (I), which does not contain the general nature of the material allegation in respect of both clauses (a) and (b) has got to be struck down-Statute permitting executive authority to impose restrictions on fundamental rights must be strictly complied with. Instances of ‘movements or acts’ mentioned in 3 (I) (b) must be stated clearly and definitely to make an effective representation. (Paras 7 to 9 & 13)

       

JUDGMENT

Birendra Prasad Sinha. J.

This is an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under section 3(1) of the Bihar Control of Crimes Ordinance, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance), contained in Annexure 1 to the application.

2. Petitioner Mahabir Prasad Akela claims to be a member of the Communist Party of India and one of its important functionaries being a member of the State Executive of the Party and Secretary of the Aurangabad District Committee. He was also a member of the Bihar Legislative Assembly from Nabinagar constituency in the year 1969-72. The relevant portion of the notice which is in Hindi, reads as under:

¼d½ Jh egkohj izlkn vdsyk vkRet Jh lhrkjke vxzoky lkekU;r% vŒ uohuxj ¼vkSjaxkckn½ es fuokl djrs gS] vlkekftd rRo gS vFkkZ~r gS vFkkZr os Loa; rFkk fxjksg ds lnL; ds :i es Hkkjrh; n.M lfgrk ds v/;k; 16 ,oa 17 ds v/khu vH;klr% n.Muh; vijk/k djrs Fks rFkk iz;Ru djrs gS rFkk izfrosnu ds vuqlkj vk;qDr vf/kfu;e 1959 dh /kkjk 27 ds varxZr vijk/kh gSA

¼[k½ vkSjaxkckn ftykUrxZr uohuxj Fkkus es vkidh xfrfof/k ;k dk;Z ls O;fDr ;k lEifr dks Mj] [krjk] uqdlku igqpk gS rFkk igqpkus okyk ds ftls fo’okl djus ds] leqfpr izfrosnu ds vk/kkj ij fo|eku gS tks Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds v/;k; 16 ,oa 17 ds v/khu n.Muh; vijk/k gSA

¼x½ lk{khx.k viuh tku ;k lEifr ds lEcU/k es vka’kdk ds dkj.k vkids fo:) lk{; nsus dks rS;kj ugh gSA

mi;qDr [k.M ¼d½A ¼Xk½ ds lEcU/k es vkids fo:) lkjoku vkjksi fuEufyf[kr lkekU; izd`fr ds gSA

¼1½ izfrosnu ds vuqlkj vki vlkekftd rRo gSA Loa; rFkk fxjksg ds lnL; ds :i es Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds v/;k; 16 ,oa 17 ds v/khu n.Muh; vijk/k gS rFkk vk;qDr vf/kfu;e 1959 dh /kkjk 27 ds vUrZxr vkids chp fo:) eqdnek ntZ fd;k x;k gS

¼2½ uohuxj Fkkus es vkids xfrfof/k rFkk dk;Z ls O;fDr lEifr dks Mj] [krjk ,oa uqdlku igq¡pk gS rFkk Ikgqpus okyk gS tks Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk 16 ,oa 17 ds vUrZxr n.Muh; vijk/k gSA

¼3½ lk{khx.k tku ,oa lEifr ds lEcU/k es vk’kadk ,oa vkids vkrad ds dkj.k vkids fo:+) lk{; nsus dks rS;kj ugh gSA dkj.k vkids fo:) lk{; nsus dk rS;kj ugh gSA

fuEufyf[kr eqdnek vkids fo:) uohuxj Fkkus es ntZ fd;k x;k gS ftlds vkjksi i= lefiZr fd;k tk jgk gS%&

¼1½ uohuxj Fkkuk dk.M la[;k&1¼3½ 72 /kkjk 3 v.Mj lsD’ku foLQVd inkFkZ dkuwu 304 ¼2½ Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vUrZxr vki vfHk;qDr gS rFkk vkids fo:) vkjksi i= lefiZr fd;k x;k gSA

¼2½ uohuxj Fkkuk dk.M la[;k 9¼6½ 72 /kkjk 302] 120ch,] 123 vkbZŒihŒlhŒ ,oa vkeZl ,DV 27 vUrZxr vki vfHk;qDr gS ,oa vkids funs’kkuqlkj ¼bUosLVhxs’ku½ nks O;fDr;ks dh gR;k dh xbZ gSA

uohuxj Fkkuk dk.M la[;k 13@79] 18@79 /kkjk 107 ,oa 116 lhŒ vkjŒ ihŒ lhŒ ds vUrZxr vkids fo:) fjiksVZ ntZ fd;k x;k gSA


By the notice, he was asked by the District Magistrate. Aurangabad, to appear before him to tender a written explanation regarding the allegations mentioned above and to show cause as to why an order under section 3 (3) of the Ordinance should not be passed against him.

3. This ordinance makes special provisions for the control and suppression of antisocial elements with a view to maintenance of the public order. Section 2 (c) of the Ordinance defines "anti-social element", which means a person who (i) either by himself or as a member of or leader of a gang, habitually commits or attempts to commit or abets the commission or offences, punishable under Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code; (ii) habitually commits or abets the commission of offences, under the suppression of Immoral Traffic in women and Girls Act, 56, or (iii) who by words or otherwise promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion race, language, caste or community or any other grounds whatsoever, feelings of enmity or hatred between different religions, racial or language groups or castes or communities; or (iv) has been found habitually passing indecent remarks to, or teasing women or girls, or (v) who has been convicted of an offence under sections 25, 26, 27, 28 or 29 of the Arms Act of 1966.

4. Section 3 of the ordinan






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top