MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Firoz Khan @ Firoz Akhtar Khan – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Mahto – Respondent
2. The plaintiff-respondent filed Title Suit No.60 of 2000 praying for permanent injunction against the defendant nos.1 to 5 in respect of the suit property mentioned in detail in the plaint. For the purpose of this Second Appeal, the facts as claimed by the plaintiff may be stated briefly that the suit property belonged to the plaintiff. The said suit plot nos.383 and 384 of Khata No.112 was recorded in R.S. Khatiyan in the name of Sukhdeo Koiree. Sukhdeo Koiree had a son, Atmaram Koiree. The plaintiff, Gobardhan Koiree is the son of said Atmaram Koiree. Khata No.79, plot no.382 was recorded in R.S. Khatiyan in the name of Mitthu Mahto whose grandson is Ram Ishwar Mahto, plaintiff no.2. R.S. Plot No.381 of Khata No.104 was recorded in the name of Lakhichand Koiree and plaintiff no.3 is the grandson o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.