SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 790

SHEEMA ALI KHAN
Suresh Baitha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s. Y.B. Giri, Shri Prakash Srivastava, Rajeev Ranjan (in 20273); Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh (in 1829); Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava (in 1831); M/s Shri Prakash Srivastava, Sunil Kr. Singh (in 2381); Mr. Binod Kumar (in 19736).
For the State : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (in 20273); Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar (in 2381).
For the Resp. No.7 : M/s Indradeo Prasad, Sanjay Kumar (in 20273).
For the Respondents: Mr. Dhurandhar Pd. Chy (in 1829); Mr. Rajesh Kumar (in 1831); Mr. Rajeev Kr. Singh (in 19736).
For Pvt. Respondents: M/s S.B.K. Mangalam, Ravi Ranjan (in 2381).
For the State Elec. : M/s R.S. Pradhan,
Commission Sanjeev Nikesh, Jainandu Kumar (in all).

ORDER

The question of law that has arisen in these batch of cases is whether the State Election Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’) can hear issues with respect to disqualification as mentioned under Sections 135 and 136 of the Bihar Gram Panchayat Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2006’) under sub-Section (2) of Section 136 of the Act of 2006 after the elections?

2. The issue as to whether the Commission has the power to adjudicate in matters relating to pre-election disqualifications has already been decided by a Bench of this Court recently in the case of Geeta Gupta Vs. The State of Bihar (CWJC No. 20564 of 2011) on 21.02.2012. This Court has held that the Commission in view of Article 243-F of the Constitution of India read with Section 136 (2) of the Act of 2006 is competent to decide the question regarding qualification or disqualification of a candidate.

3. The argument raised on behalf of the petitioners is that there is a total bar imposed by Article 243-O of the Constitution of India, which envisages that all disputes arising out of an election are to be decided by filing an election petition. Various arguments have been raised in this c


































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top