SHEEMA ALI KHAN
Hawaldar Nathjee Singh @ Nathjee Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
2. The prosecution case is based on the written complaint filed before the Commandant of B.M.P.-6, Muzaffarpur by Tejan Singh (PW 3) in which it has been stated that while the appellant was posted as Bodyguard of the D.I.G, Muzaffarpur, he had taken Rs. 8,000/- from his nephew, Vijay Singh and had promised to get him a job as a Havildar. When the appellant failed to secure a job for his nephew, his nephew demanded back the money, whereupon it is said that the appellant told him that he had already paid the money to the D.I.G., Muzaffarpur. However, he had promised to return the money in installments. The appellant had supposedly paid a sum of Rs. 200/- to Vijay Singh. Later on, he refused to make any other payment. It is also said that a Panchayat was held to resolve the matter between them which however, was not successful. On the basis of the aforesaid written report, the matte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.