2013 Supreme(Pat) 148
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Shailendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Nirbhay K.Singh GP-26
For the University : Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary (In CWJC No.15350 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Shambhu Nath
For the University : Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary (In CWJC No.19816 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Arif Raza
For the Respondent/s: Mr. J.S. Arora SC-6 (In CWJC No.18013 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Sandhya Mishra
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal GA-1
For the University : Mr. Anil Singh (In CWJC No.18397 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Arif Raza
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Kumar Sachin GP-24 (In CWJC No.17935 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Alok Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Neelu Agrwal GA-6 (In CWJC No.18428 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Alok Kumar
For the Respondent/s:Mr. Md. N. Hoda Khan SC-18 (In CWJC No.18298 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal GA-1
For the University : Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary (In CWJC No.18385 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Arif Raza
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Nirbhay K.Singh GP-26 (In CWJC No.18359 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Arif Raza
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Radhika Raman Gp23 (In CWJC No.18635 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Arif Raza
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Manikant Mishra Gp25 (In CWJC No.15493 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Neelu Agrwal GA-6 (In CWJC No.16643 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Kaushal Kr. Jha SC-4 (In CWJC No.16819 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Vinay Kriti Singh SC-5 (In CWJC No.16003 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Rajendra Kr. Jha GP-18 (In CWJC No.16052 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Nirbhay K.Singh GP-26 (In CWJC No.16074 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. P.K. Verma AAG-5 (In CWJC No.16078 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Neeraj Nandan GP20 (In CWJC No.16409 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Amish Chandra Sinha
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Sanjay Kr No.1 SC12 (In CWJC No.20213 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Dinbandhu Singh GP-9
For the University : Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary (In CWJC No.17251 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. K.P. Gupta SC-16
For the University : Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary (In CWJC No.16932 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Rajesh Tripathy
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal GA1 (In CWJC No.17548 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri (In CWJC No.17662 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Jawahar Pd. Karn, AAG-4
For the University : Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary (In CWJC No.17688 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Alok Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh Ga7 (In CWJC No.15307 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Pranav Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abhay Shankar Jha SC14
For the University :Mr. Arbind Kumar (In CWJC No.15584 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Pranav Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Shail Kumari SC15
For the University :Mr. Arbind Kumar (In CWJC No.16797 of 2012)
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Pranav Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambasta GP14
For the University :Mr. Arbind Kumar
ORDER
1. In these batch of writ petitions filed by the retired teachers of various Universities in Bihar initially their prayer was to direct the State and the Universities to revise the pension and pensionary benefits to its retired employees in consonance with the State Government Resolution No.820 dated 23.09.2009 as resolved to be made in respect of Government employees. During pendency of these writ petitions, the State Government came up with a resolution under Memo No.1674 dated 16.08.2012 specifically resolving revision of pension and pensionary benefits in relation to retired employees of the Universities and its constituent Colleges. Now, this having been done ultimately, the grievance is limited to Clause-8 of this resolution of the Government dated 16.08.2012 by which arrears of pension and pensionary benefits accruing as a consequence of revision thereunder directed to be paid in three yearly deferments. It is the propriety and legality thereof, the deferment of payment of arrears, which is now under challenge. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, the State and the Universities and with their consent these writ petitions having been heard at length for its f
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
