RAVI RANJAN
Brahmdeo Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Through this writ application, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 13.09.2011 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur-cum-Licensing Authority, as contained in Annexure-5, by which the licence of the petitioner for running a shop under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 has been cancelled.
3. At the time of hearing of this matter, learned counsel for the petitioner has raised two points which stand enumerated in the paragraph nos. 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of this writ application. First point is that the licensing authority has relied upon an enquiry report as well as the statements of the consumers which was recorded against him, however, it has been stated in clear terms in the aforesaid paragraphs that at no point of time either a copy of such report or the statements of such consumers were supplied to him before taking a final decision so that a proper reply to the show cause notice could have been given by the petitioner. Second issue raised by the petitioner is that so far consumers of Repura Village are concerned their names having been detached from the petitioner’s lice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.