SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Pat) 478

KISHORE K.MANDAL
Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sahil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner is an accused facing trial vide Sessions Trial No. 453/06 vide Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Saran at Chapra.

3. Husband of Smt. Sunita Devi died unnatural death on 23.07.2004. The wife lodged U.D. case on 27.07.2004. The brother of the deceased thereafter lodged an F.I.R. after 19 days alleging therein that the petitioner had abeted suicide of his brother. Accordingly, the F.I.R. was lodged against the petitioner under section 306 of the I.P.C. and the same was investigated and charge sheet was submitted in the year, 2006. The case was thereafter committed to the court of Sessions where the charges were framed and the case was taken up for trial. At the trial several prosecution witnesses including the wife of the deceased except the Investigating officer and the doctor were examined. The wife of the deceased namely, Sunita Devi was examined as P.W.3 on 20.8.2009 and discharged. Several years thereafter two applications were filed on behalf of the prosecution. The applications are annexed as Annexure-3 series. By the first application, the prosecut










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top