SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Pat) 883

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Neela Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Harendra Kumar Singh.
Fort the Respondents 1 to 4: Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur.

Order

Heard the parties and with their consent this appeal is disposed of at the stage of hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Admittedly, one Ratneshwar Prasad Singh lost his life in a motor accident. The truck, bearing registration no. B.R.A. 9013, owned by Maheshwar Prasad Singh, respondent no.5 was involved in the accident. Heirs of deceased filed Claim Case No. 5 of 1995, under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). A petition under Section 140 of the Act was filed for grant of interim compensation, which was allowed by the impugned order dated 9.8.1996. By that time, owner of truck had not appeared in the claim case. However, the Tribunal directed the owner/insurer of the truck to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- as interim compensation to the claimants. Against the said order the insurance company has filed the present appeal under Section 173 of the Act, on the ground that at this stage the owner and not the insurer was required to pay the compensation amount.

3. On a close scrutiny of the provisions of sections 140 and 141 of the Act, I do not find anything contained therein, which would suggest that the liability which acc






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top