SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 97

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Sheo Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bala Singh – Respondent


Order

Heard the parties and with their consent this appeal is disposed of under Order 41, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. One Ramkhelawan Singh left behind his widow, Mostt. Moleshara, son Bala Singh and a daughter. Mostt. Moleshra executed a deed of gift dated 10.5.1976 in favour of Shea Narayan Singh, said to be her daughter's son in respect of the lands, detailed in schedule 'ka' to the plaint. Bala Singh filed Title Suit No. 28 of 1979 for declaration of the said deed of gift to be forged, fabricated and void. On the dispute regarding the years of death of Ramkhelawan Singh, whether in 1935 or 1945, both the courts below concurrently held that he died in 1945 i.e. after coming into force of the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937.

3. The defendant also examined the scribe and attesting witness of the said deed, Ext. A to prove execution thereof by Mostt. Moleshara. A sale deed, Ext. C dated 7.12.1978, executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff in respect of part of the Schedule 'ka' land i.e. part of the land covered under Ext. A was also brought on record to show that the plaintiff himself had purchased part of the suit land.

4. In such circumstances, I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top