SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Pat) 31

M.Y.EQBAL
Lallan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Parmeshwar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Samarendra Pratap Singh, Gajendra Nath Ojha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Om Prakash Shrivastava.

Order

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This civil revision application is directed against the order dated 27.9.96 passed by Second Additional District and Sessions Judge, Saran in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 72/84. The learned appellate court confirmed the order passed by the 1st. Subordinate, Judge, Saran, in Title Suit No. 273/93. By the said order the trial court granted temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure directing the defendant/petitioner not to disturb the possession of the plaintiff opposite party.

3. The relevant facts relating to disputes are that the defendant/petitioner filed title eviction suit no. 56/79 against the plaintiff of Title Suit No. 273/93 for his eviction from the suit premises on the ground of non-payment of rent. The suit was eventually decreed on the basis of compromise. In terms of the compromise decree the plaintiff opposite party agreed to hand-over possession of the premises to the defendant/petitioner by December, 1993 and till then he agreed to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 200/- per month. It is stated that till June, 1993 the plaintiff/opposite party paid rent and thereafter stopped payment. The plai





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top