High Court of Patna
R.N. Prasad, J.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Petitioner
Vs.
Manju Devi & others – Respondents
M.A. No. 239 of 1997
Decided On : 21. 8.1998
Withdrawal - Motor Vehicles Act - The court allowed the claimant to withdraw the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing that the deposited amount shall be adjusted against the award, as established by relevant case law.
Fact of the Case:
The claimant filed a petition for withdrawal of the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, which was allowed by the court based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and case law.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act could be allowed to be withdrawn by the claimant, as it should be adjusted against the award, as established by relevant case law.
Issues: The main issue was whether the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act could be withdrawn by the claimant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the first proviso to Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing that the deposited amount shall be adjusted against the award, as established by relevant case law.
Final Decision: The petition filed by the claimant was allowed, and the claimant was allowed to withdraw the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
I.A. No. 8569/98
The petition has been tiled on behalf of the claimant for withdrawal of the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
2. United India Insurance Company Ltd. filed an appeal against the interim award passed by the Tribunal. The appeal was disposed of on 6.1.1988. The claimant respondents have filed the present application for withdrawal of the said amount. Counsel for the appellant has no objection.
3. The question involved is as to whether the amount deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act can be allowed to be withdrawn by either of the party. It was pointed out that first proviso to Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act says that only a person, who is required to pay the amount can file an appeal and such person shall be liable to deposit rupees twenty five thousand or fifty per cent of the amount so awarded to maintain the appeal. Emphasis has been given by the learned counsel for the petitioner that two relevant things have been mentioned in the proviso i.e. a person who is required to pay the amount and that amount to be deposited i.e. rupees twenty five thousand or fifty per cent of the amount so awarded. Therefore, it has to be considered that the amount deposited, no doubt, is for the purpose of maintaining the appeal but the said amount would be adjusted against the award. Learned counsel in support of his submission relied upon a decision in the case of Sardara Singh vs. Durga Devi and others, 1996 (2) Accident Claim Journal 1188. He also referred a decision in the case of Devi Das vs. Chandrakala and others, 1996 (1) Accident Claim Journal 566 wherein similar view has been expressed. It is mainifest from the aforesaid decisions that the amount so deposited shall be adjusted against the award.
4. In that view of the matter, petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the claimant petitioner is allowed to withdraw the deposited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.