SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 528

AFTAB ALAM, N.N.SINGH
Social Action for relief to Consumer – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi Municipal corporation – Respondent


Order

C.W.J.C. Nos. 2704/1995 (R) and 586/1996 (R), though disposed of a common judgment, dated 26.6.1997 were separately dealt with in the judgment. Paras 2 to 32 (from pages 2 to 13) [Pages 157 to 163 of PLJR] of the judgment dealt with C.W.J.C. No. 586/1996 (R) and paras 33 to 62 (from pages 13 to 26) [Pages 163 to 170 of PLJR] dealt with C.W.J.C. No. 2704/1995 (R).

2. In has come to our notice that in the margin on pages 2 and 13 the case number of one case has been typed in place of the other. It is accordingly directed that in the margin on page 2 the case number would read as C.W.J.C. No. 586/1996 (R) and in the margin on page 13 of the judgment the case number would read as C.W.J.C. No. 2704/1995 (R).

3. Let necessary corrections be carried out in the judgment as well as in the certified copies of the judgment, if any, issued.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top