SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 528

HIGH COURT OF PATNA, (RANCHI BENCH)
Aftab Alam & N.N. Singh, JJ.
Social Action for relief to the Consumer and anr.
Ranchi House Owners Association & ors. - Petitioners
vs.
Ranchi Municipal corporation & Anr.
The State of Bihar and Ors. – Respondents
C.W.J.C. No. 2704 of 1995 (R)

The court has the authority to direct corrections to be made in the judgment and certified copies to rectify typographical errors.

Headnote:

Order - C.W.J.C. Nos. 2704/1995 (R) and 586/1996 (R) - The court directed necessary corrections to be carried out in the judgment and certified copies due to a typographical error in the case numbers.

Fact of the Case:

The judgment addressed C.W.J.C. Nos. 2704/1995 (R) and 586/1996 (R) separately, but a typographical error in the case numbers was noted on pages 2 and 13.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the necessary corrections to be made in the judgment and certified copies to rectify the typographical error in the case numbers.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi:

Final Decision: The court ordered the correction of the typographical error in the case numbers on page 2 and 13 of the judgment and in any certified copies issued.

Order

C.W.J.C. Nos. 2704/1995 (R) and 586/1996 (R), though disposed of a common judgment, dated 26.6.1997 were separately dealt with in the judgment. Paras 2 to 32 (from pages 2 to 13) [Pages 157 to 163 of PLJR] of the judgment dealt with C.W.J.C. No. 586/1996 (R) and paras 33 to 62 (from pages 13 to 26) [Pages 163 to 170 of PLJR] dealt with C.W.J.C. No. 2704/1995 (R).

2. In has come to our notice that in the margin on pages 2 and 13 the case number of one case has been typed in place of the other. It is accordingly directed that in the margin on page 2 the case number would read as C.W.J.C. No. 586/1996 (R) and in the margin on page 13 of the judgment the case number would read as C.W.J.C. No. 2704/1995 (R).

3. Let necessary corrections be carried out in the judgment as well as in the certified copies of the judgment, if any, issued.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top