SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 618

J.N.DUBEY
Jagu Mallah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioners: M/s Chandeshwar Jha, Arun Kumar Jha and Satish Chandra Jha II.
For State : Mr. Surendra Kumar.

JUDGMENT

Dr. J.N. Dubey, J.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30.4.1985 of the respondent no. 1, the Joint Director of Consolidation (Purnia), Patna.

2. It appears that the land in dispute was recorded in the names of the petitioners in the statement of principles prepared under Section 9A of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'). The father of respondent no. 4, Dudhraj Mallah filed objection under Section 10(2) of the Act, claiming that the land in dispute was settled by the ex-landlord in his favour by means of a sada Parwangi long ago and since then, he has been in possession thereof but his name was wrongly omitted from the revenue records. The petitioners contested the objection claiming that in the Cadastral Survey Old Khata no. 161 was recorded in the names of Gaina Gorhi, Gujal Gorhi, Chaman Gorhi, Bhoodan Gorhi, Lalji Gorhi and Dhanu Gorhi, ancestors of the petitioners. The land was neither abandoned, surrendered nor auction sold and, as such, the ancestors of the petitioners continued in possession thereof as occupancy raiyats.

3. The Consolidation Officer, Tribeniganj, who heard the objection,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top